Files
vitya dcf4077e82 feat(skills): bundle minimum skill set from claude-skills into factory/skills/
Copies 8 standalone skills (active-platform, caveman, project-discipline,
pulling-before-work, setup-tasks, setup-wiki, using-tasks, using-wiki) from
~/projects/claude-skills/skills/ and all 14 superpowers sub-skills from the
installed plugin cache into factory/skills/superpowers/.

Adds skills install step to bootstrap.ps1: copies all factory/skills/
directories to ~/.claude/skills/ so users get the skill set automatically
without manual plugin install for the baseline set.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 13:24:55 +03:00

9.0 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

name, version, description
name version description
project-discipline 0.1.1 Codifies five cross-project discipline rules: (1) project CLAUDE.md / .wiki/CLAUDE.md / .tasks/ override defaults from any other skill (specs go to .wiki/concepts/, not docs/superpowers/specs/; tasks to .tasks/, not docs/superpowers/plans/); (2) all work on master/main, no feature branches without explicit user approval; (3) bump semver on every edit of versioned artifacts (SKILL.md frontmatter, package.json, pyproject.toml) per MAJOR/MINOR/PATCH rules, recorded in commit message; (4) commit freely, never push without explicit per-session user approval — grant via "разреши автопуш" / "allow auto-push", revoke via "отзови" / "revoke", session end resets to ask-mode; force/delete/non-ff push always asks; (5) transit-zone / brainstorm workspaces — artifacts go to .brainstorm/ or global wiki only via explicit user direction, never auto-promote by analogy. Activated by "follow project discipline" trigger in CLAUDE.md (added by project-bootstrap v1.5.0+).

project-discipline

Four cross-project rules. Read at session start. Apply before any other skill's defaults touch paths, branches, versions, or remote pushes.

When this runs

At session start — when CLAUDE.md contains the line follow project discipline. The skill is a policy document; the agent reads it and applies the four rules to all subsequent work in the session.

On explicit reference — when the user says "use project discipline", "соблюди дисциплину", "проектные правила", "что у меня по правилам?", or close variants asking about/applying the rules.

The skill itself takes no actions and has no external side-effects. It instructs the agent how to behave.

Rule 1 — Project conventions override skill defaults

Before applying defaults from any other skill (superpowers, frontend-design, mcp-builder, etc.), read in this order:

  1. CLAUDE.md in the project root.
  2. .wiki/CLAUDE.md (if it exists).
  3. .tasks/STATUS.md (if it exists).

Any path, format, or workflow explicitly stated in those files overrides the skill default.

Concrete consequences:

  • Specs / design documents go to .wiki/concepts/<topic>-design.md, not docs/superpowers/specs/.
  • Task tracking / implementation plans go to .tasks/<slug>.md plus a board entry in .tasks/STATUS.md (the using-tasks format), not docs/superpowers/plans/ or any inline-in-chat plan format.
  • Frontmatter, naming conventions, log format — as described in the project's .wiki/CLAUDE.md.

If no convention is stated explicitly — fall back to the skill default.

Rule 2 — Master-only

All work happens on the repo's main integration branch — usually master, but if a project uses main, treat main as equivalent.

  • No git checkout -b feature/foo for solo work.
  • Sync with remote: git pull --ff-only or git pull --rebase. No merge commits for solo work.
  • If a task genuinely requires isolation (large experiment, risky refactor with rollback potential, multi-day work with intermediate WIP commits) — ask the user: "this needs its own branch, ok?" — and wait for explicit approval. Without approval, work continues on master.

If the agent finds itself on a non-main branch (after a manual git checkout) or in detached HEAD — report it and ask whether to return to master before working.

Rule 3 — Versioning discipline

When editing any artifact with a semver field, bump the version before committing per:

  • MAJOR (X+1.0.0) — breaks the contract. Renames, removed triggers, layout changes, removed public functions, breaking API change.
  • MINOR (X.Y+1.0) — adds capability without breaking. New trigger, new optional step, new public function.
  • PATCH (X.Y.Z+1) — wording / clarity / typo fixes with no behavior change.

The bump is recorded in the commit message: feat(<artifact>): … [vX.Y.Z] or whatever convention the project uses (see Rule 1).

Applies to: skills/<name>/SKILL.md (version: in frontmatter), package.json ("version":), pyproject.toml (version =), Cargo.toml (version =), and any other semver field in any other manifest.

If the artifact is packaged as dist/<name>.skill, dist/*.tgz, etc. — rebuild the package in the same or the next commit. Forgotten dist artifacts are a common cause of deploying stale binaries.

First edit of an unversioned artifact that COULD have a semver field (a new skill without version:, a new package.json without "version":) — add version: 0.1.0 (or its equivalent) before committing; do not bump anything.

Does not apply to: artifacts with no semver field and no potential for one (wiki concept pages, README.md, shell scripts without a public interface).

Rule 4 — Commit yes, push no (session-scoped)

Every session starts in ask-before-push mode. On every git push, ask:

Готов push'нуть в <remote>/<branch> (N коммитов: ). Ок?

(or its English equivalent if the user is communicating in English) and wait for explicit yes / да / push / equivalent. Without confirmation — do not push.

Granting auto-push within a session. When the user says:

  • "разреши автопуш" / "allow auto-push" / "автопуш ок" / equivalent

— push without further confirmation until the end of the session or until revoked.

Revoking auto-push within a session. When the user says:

  • "отзови автопуш" / "revoke auto-push" / "снова спрашивай" / equivalent

— return to ask-before-push mode.

Session end resets to ask-mode. The next session starts asking again, regardless of what was granted in the previous one. This is intentional: a grant is given for the current context (user nearby, consciously decided pushes are safe), and should not survive a context switch.

Always ask, even with active grant:

  • git push --force / --force-with-lease (history rewrite);
  • git push origin --delete <branch> (branch deletion);
  • push to a remote/branch other than the current tracked upstream (git push other-remote ..., git push origin other-branch);
  • push to the main branch that would require non-fast-forward (i.e. would need force).

A grant covers ordinary fast-forward push to the configured upstream. Anything else is a separate class of operation and needs its own decision.

What counts as "push": only git push family commands. Local commits, git stash push, etc. are not push; the grant does not apply.

Rule 5 — Transit-zone / brainstorm workspaces

Some workspaces are transit zones — discussion areas with no .tasks/, where brainstorm artifacts are explicitly NOT auto-promoted to project wikis.

Default destination for brainstorm artifacts:

  • In-progress brainstorm outputs.brainstorm/<topic>.md (or whatever the workspace's README/CLAUDE.md declares)
  • Mature, cross-cutting outputs~/projects/.wiki/concepts/<topic>-design.md via mcp__projects-meta__knowledge_ingestonly when user explicitly directs this

Agent must NOT auto-promote brainstorm artifacts to global wikis by analogy with Rule 1. Convergence-moment (move from workspace to permanent wiki) is a user decision, not an automatic action.

Example: ~/projects/.meeting-room/ is a transit zone. Its CLAUDE.md explicitly states "no .tasks/, transit zone, artifacts go to .brainstorm/ or global wiki via user command." Rule 1's "project conventions override" applies, but the override is explicit in the workspace contract — auto-promotion by analogy would violate that contract.

When in doubt: ask the user "this goes to .brainstorm/, or should I promote to shared wiki?" rather than assuming.

Out of scope

The skill does not:

  • modify CLAUDE.md (that's project-bootstrap's job);
  • enforce rules via git hooks / pre-commit / CI (this is agent discipline, not tooling);
  • manage settings.json permissions (that's update-config);
  • check the existence of .wiki/ / .tasks/ (that's setup-wiki / setup-tasks / project-bootstrap); if a project doesn't have them, Rule 1 simply finds no overrides and falls back to skill defaults.

Why this exists

In a tightly-disciplined repo (claude-skills) the four rules already hold by accident — the agent reads .wiki/CLAUDE.md, knows specs go to .wiki/concepts/, knows to bump version:, knows not to push without confirmation. In other projects of the same user, that discipline does not transfer: the agent uses superpowers' default docs/superpowers/specs/, branches on a whim, forgets version: bumps, and pushes without asking. This skill makes the discipline explicit and portable.

Full design rationale (why one skill instead of four, why a skill instead of inline CLAUDE.md lines, scope of each rule, push-permission mechanism choice) lives in .wiki/concepts/project-discipline-design.md (in this repo; in other projects bootstrapped from this repo, the design lives in claude-skills).