Files
factory/skills/superpowers/systematic-debugging/condition-based-waiting.md
vitya dcf4077e82 feat(skills): bundle minimum skill set from claude-skills into factory/skills/
Copies 8 standalone skills (active-platform, caveman, project-discipline,
pulling-before-work, setup-tasks, setup-wiki, using-tasks, using-wiki) from
~/projects/claude-skills/skills/ and all 14 superpowers sub-skills from the
installed plugin cache into factory/skills/superpowers/.

Adds skills install step to bootstrap.ps1: copies all factory/skills/
directories to ~/.claude/skills/ so users get the skill set automatically
without manual plugin install for the baseline set.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 13:24:55 +03:00

3.4 KiB

Condition-Based Waiting

Overview

Flaky tests often guess at timing with arbitrary delays. This creates race conditions where tests pass on fast machines but fail under load or in CI.

Core principle: Wait for the actual condition you care about, not a guess about how long it takes.

When to Use

digraph when_to_use {
    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" [shape=diamond];
    "Testing timing behavior?" [shape=diamond];
    "Document WHY timeout needed" [shape=box];
    "Use condition-based waiting" [shape=box];

    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" -> "Testing timing behavior?" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Document WHY timeout needed" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Use condition-based waiting" [label="no"];
}

Use when:

  • Tests have arbitrary delays (setTimeout, sleep, time.sleep())
  • Tests are flaky (pass sometimes, fail under load)
  • Tests timeout when run in parallel
  • Waiting for async operations to complete

Don't use when:

  • Testing actual timing behavior (debounce, throttle intervals)
  • Always document WHY if using arbitrary timeout

Core Pattern

// ❌ BEFORE: Guessing at timing
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 50));
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

// ✅ AFTER: Waiting for condition
await waitFor(() => getResult() !== undefined);
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

Quick Patterns

Scenario Pattern
Wait for event waitFor(() => events.find(e => e.type === 'DONE'))
Wait for state waitFor(() => machine.state === 'ready')
Wait for count waitFor(() => items.length >= 5)
Wait for file waitFor(() => fs.existsSync(path))
Complex condition waitFor(() => obj.ready && obj.value > 10)

Implementation

Generic polling function:

async function waitFor<T>(
  condition: () => T | undefined | null | false,
  description: string,
  timeoutMs = 5000
): Promise<T> {
  const startTime = Date.now();

  while (true) {
    const result = condition();
    if (result) return result;

    if (Date.now() - startTime > timeoutMs) {
      throw new Error(`Timeout waiting for ${description} after ${timeoutMs}ms`);
    }

    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 10)); // Poll every 10ms
  }
}

See condition-based-waiting-example.ts in this directory for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (waitForEvent, waitForEventCount, waitForEventMatch) from actual debugging session.

Common Mistakes

Polling too fast: setTimeout(check, 1) - wastes CPU Fix: Poll every 10ms

No timeout: Loop forever if condition never met Fix: Always include timeout with clear error

Stale data: Cache state before loop Fix: Call getter inside loop for fresh data

When Arbitrary Timeout IS Correct

// Tool ticks every 100ms - need 2 ticks to verify partial output
await waitForEvent(manager, 'TOOL_STARTED'); // First: wait for condition
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 200));   // Then: wait for timed behavior
// 200ms = 2 ticks at 100ms intervals - documented and justified

Requirements:

  1. First wait for triggering condition
  2. Based on known timing (not guessing)
  3. Comment explaining WHY

Real-World Impact

From debugging session (2025-10-03):

  • Fixed 15 flaky tests across 3 files
  • Pass rate: 60% → 100%
  • Execution time: 40% faster
  • No more race conditions