feat: add code-review scenario and cross-LLM review roles

- scenarios/code-review.md: multi-agent code review scenario with
  defender/attacker/security/moderator roles
- config.yaml: add defender, attacker, security roles for cross-LLM
  review; keep existing discussion roles; add commented deepseek provider

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-04 00:42:04 +03:00
parent 96b6f061f3
commit 2887b2309a
2 changed files with 90 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ providers:
routerai:
base_url: "https://routerai.ru/api/v1"
api_key: "${MEETING_ROOM_ROUTERAI_API_KEY}" # set in env or replace here
ollama_cloud:
api_key: 02a8f6e9f9744088885982ac645f1ce1.HB1MFh4AlTpyic9oJGxQjNuA
base_url: https://ollama.com/v1
# openai:
# base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
@@ -22,13 +25,18 @@ providers:
# base_url: "http://localhost:11434/v1"
# api_key: "ollama"
# deepseek:
# base_url: "https://api.deepseek.com/v1"
# api_key: "${MEETING_ROOM_DEEPSEEK_API_KEY}"
# ─── Roles ───
# tools: all | full | files | readonly | web | none | or list ["read_file", "web_search"]
roles:
# ── General discussion ──
moderator:
name: "Moderator"
provider: routerai
provider: ollama_cloud
model: "gpt-4o-mini"
temperature: 0.7
tools: "none"
@@ -40,7 +48,7 @@ roles:
skeptic:
name: "Skeptic"
provider: routerai
provider: ollama_cloud
model: "gpt-4o-mini"
temperature: 0.9
tools: "readonly"
@@ -52,7 +60,7 @@ roles:
idea_generator:
name: "Idea Generator"
provider: routerai
provider: ollama_cloud
model: "gpt-4o-mini"
temperature: 1.0
tools: "web"
@@ -65,7 +73,7 @@ roles:
analyst:
name: "Analyst"
provider: routerai
provider: ollama_cloud
model: "gpt-4o-mini"
temperature: 0.5
tools: "all"
@@ -76,6 +84,45 @@ roles:
Propose concrete action plans.
Use tools to verify facts, read project files, and search for info.
# ── Code review ──
defender:
name: "Defender"
provider: ollama_cloud
model: "gpt-4o-mini"
temperature: 0.6
tools: "readonly"
system_prompt: |
You wrote this code. Explain your design decisions, defend your
choices, acknowledge legitimate concerns but push back on
unjustified criticism. Reference specific files and line numbers
when explaining your logic. Read the code files being reviewed.
attacker:
name: "Attacker"
provider: ollama_cloud
model: "gpt-4o-mini"
temperature: 0.9
tools: "readonly"
system_prompt: |
You are a ruthless code reviewer. Hunt for: bugs, logic errors,
edge cases, performance bottlenecks, poor abstractions, violated
DRY/SOLID principles, misleading names, missing tests, and dead
code. Don't be polite — be precise. Cite specific lines.
Use read_file and search_in_files to examine the code thoroughly.
security:
name: "Security"
provider: ollama_cloud
model: "gpt-4o-mini"
temperature: 0.4
tools: "web"
system_prompt: |
You are a security specialist. Check for: injection vulnerabilities
(SQL, XSS, command), auth/authz gaps, data exposure, insecure
defaults, dependency risks, path traversal, and secret leaks.
Use web_search to check for known CVEs in dependencies.
Be specific — cite exact code locations and explain the attack vector.
defaults:
max_rounds: 8
language: "ru"